Prediction of Laura Junior vs Mary Ann Seames Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
L. Junior vs M. Ann Seames

Laura Junior

USA

0

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Mary Ann Seames

USA

0

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Junior 0 - 0 Seames

They have played 2 sets in total, with Laura Junior winning 2 and Mary Ann Seames winning 0. The last match between Laura Junior and Mary Ann Seames was at the Philadelphia, 11-08-1924, Round: SF, Surface: N/A, with Laura Junior getting the victory 6-4 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Junior	0
Seames	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(SF) Philadelphia(08-11-24)

Stats

Laura Junior

Mary Ann Seames

L. Junior vs M. A. Seames H2H Profile

L. Junior	Stats	M. A. Seames
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
50.00% (20-20)	Career Total W/L	47.50% (19-21)
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

L. Junior vs M. A. Seames Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Laura Junior has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Mary Ann Seames has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Laura Junior, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mary Ann Seames has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Laura Junior has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mary Ann Seames has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Laura Junior has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Mary Ann Seames winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Laura Junior has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 50% (W/L 20/20), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 50% (W/L 20/20). Mary Ann Seames has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 50% (W/L 19/20), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
Player level: In the last year, Laura Junior has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Mary Ann Seames has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Laura Junior winning 1 times and Mary Ann Seames being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Laura Junior winning 2 and Mary Ann Seames winning 0.
The last match between Laura Junior and Mary Ann Seames was at the Philadelphia, 11-08-1924, Round: SF, Surface: N/A, with Laura Junior getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Laura Junior has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Mary Ann Seames has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Laura Junior has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mary Ann Seames has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Laura Junior has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mary Ann Seames has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Laura Junior vs Mary Ann Seames Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

L. Junior vs M. A. Seames H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

L. Junior	Stats	M. A. Seames
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	8
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

L. Junior Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Pennsylvania Closed - 11-09-1933
F Marie MackeyM. Mackey	W	6-4 4-6 6-1	Stats
Petersburg - 22-08-1932
R3 Virginia FosterV. Foster	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
Scotch Plains ATA Chps - 15-08-1932
R3 Muriel MccroryM. Mccrory	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
Tuskegee ATA Chps - 17-08-1931
R4 Laura DemeryL. Demery	L	UNK	Stats
Darby - 30-08-1930
F Francis FordF. Ford	W	6-2 6-4	Stats

View All

M. A. Seames Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Hampton ATA Chps - 14-08-1933
R3 Imogene BriceI. Brice	W	5-7 6-4 6-0	Stats
R4 Frances GittensF. Gittens	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
Scotch Plains ATA Chps - 15-08-1932
R3 Frances GittensF. Gittens	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
Cincinnati Mid-Western - 08-08-1932
F Fredonia BundyF. Bundy	L	6-3 10-8	Stats
Louisville - 03-08-1931
F Rhoda SmithR. Smith	L	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

L. Junior vs M. A. Seames Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

L. Junior	Stats	M. A. Seames
50.00% (20/20)	YTD Win/Loss	47.50% (19/21)
49.37% (39/40)	Sets Win/Loss	42.47% (31/42)
48.95% (350/365)	Games Win/Loss	100.00% (330/0)
0% (0/0)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/1)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
51% (18/35)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	44% (15/34)
67% (6/9)	Deciding Set Win %	80% (4/5)
94% (17/16)	1st Set Won, Won Match	92% (13/12)
6% (17/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	8% (13/1)
11% (18/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	14% (21/3)